Critical Thinking Skills for University Success Coursera Quiz Answers

Get All Weeks Critical Thinking Skills for University Success Coursera Quiz Answers

Quiz 1: 1.1 Practice quiz

Q1. Which of the following are the learning objectives for this MOOC?

Check all that apply.

View

1. Identify types of arguments, and bias within arguments, in order to better evaluate the strength of arguments.

2.Understand the importance and function of critical thinking in academic culture.

Q2. Which of the following are NON-assessed activities on this MOOC?

Check all that apply.

View
1. In video questions& polls

2.Short quizzes after each lesson

Q3. What percentage of your total marks is the final summative assessment worth?

Check one option only.

View
35%
Critical Thinking Skills for University Success Coursera Quiz Answers

Quiz 2: 1.2 Practice Quiz

Q1. Which of the following are some of the core values and expectations of academic culture mentioned by academics in 1.2a?

Check all that apply.

View
1. Academic integrity
2.Critical thinking
3.Intellectual inquiry and communication
4.Ethical contribution

Q2. What metaphor do Molinari and Kavanagh (2013) use to describe critical thinking?

Check one option.

View
A slippery eel

Q3. At university, what is an argument?

Check one option.

View
An attempt to defend, validate or explain a conclusion using specific reasons or evidence

Quiz 3: 1.3 Practice Quiz

Q1. In lesson 1.3a, Jonathon mentions that he learned two valuable skills when he struggled to pass a first-year university course. What were they?

Check two options

View

1. Resilience

2.How to ask for help

Q2. In lesson 1.3a, why does Ben say he felt comfortable at university?

Check one option.

View
Because he was pushed to think in new ways

Q3. In lesson 1.3b, Jenni contrasts her essay writing and argumentation at the beginning of her university course with the argumentation at the end. What differences did she notice?

Check two options.

View
1.At the end of her time at university, she was able to use references more to support her propositions.

2. At the end of her course, she made broader, more cohesive arguments.

Quiz 4: 1.4 Practice Quiz

Q1. Mohammed is a third-year undergraduate student studying epidemiology. His professor is highly regarded in the field and Mohammed is very excited to study under him. While trying to replicate one of his professor’s experiments, Mohammed notices that another student has made a mistake while calculating the data for the experiment. In one of the equations, one of the signs is around the wrong way. This has made the results of the experiment seem really positive. However, when Mohammed does his calculations, he notices that his results aren’t very good at all.

Mohammed does the calculations multiple times. He consults a few other students, and they all come up with the same thing. It isn’t an assignment, and students are allowed to collaborate and work together, so Mohammed tells the student about the mistake. However, the other student shrugs and refuses to change it because it is the same as the one used in the original paper.

What is Mohammed required to do?

Check one option.

View
Mohammed isn’t required to do anything.

Q2. Consider the following situation.

Mohammed is a third-year undergraduate student studying epidemiology. His professor is highly regarded in the field and Mohammed is very excited to study under him. However, after seeing another student use an incorrect equation while trying to replicate one of his professor’s experiments, Mohammed noticed that his professor made a small error when calculating the data for the original experiment. When Mohammed fixes the
error, it changes the results so much that the conclusion isn’t correct anymore. Mohammed checks the original and his own multiple times but he still gets the same result.

Mohammed is very concerned because the paper with the published results of the experiments his professor did has been referenced many times.

What should Mohammed do?

Check one option.

View
Bring this to his professor’s attention as soon
as possible.

Q3. Consider the following situation.

Mohammed is a third-year undergraduate student studying epidemiology. His professor is highly regarded in the field and Mohammed is very excited to study under him. However, while trying to replicate one of his professor’s experiments, Mohammed notices that his professor made a small error when calculating the data for the original experiment. When Mohammed fixes the error, it changes the results so much that the conclusion isn’t correct anymore. Mohammed checks the original and his own multiple times but he still gets
the same result.

Mohammed is very concerned because the paper with the published results of the experiments his professor did has been referenced many times.

Mohammed decides to approach his professor with the mistake and his calculations. However, his professor tells him not to worry about it and that “is just how science is”. His professor does nothing.

What should Mohammed do now?

Check one option.

View
Go to the head of the school and ask for their opinion on the situation.

Quiz 5: Summative Quiz – Module 1

Q1. “A wise man … proportions his belief to the evidence.” – David Hume What quality of academic culture does this relate to?

Check one option.

View
The need for proof to support opinions

Q2.Consider the following situation:

For a course Timmy is taking, he has to conduct a research experiment and write a full research report. Part of the research report is a literature review. Timmy feels really lucky because earlier in the semester they had to write a literature review for the same class.

Can Timmy use the same literature review he did earlier in the course for this assignment?

Check one option.

View
It depends; Timmy should check his course outline or lecturer to make sure.

Q3. Which of the following is a trait of critical thinking according to lecture 1.2b?

Check two options.

View
1. It reflects on its own basis, background, and reasons.
2.It aims to be objective and free from bias.

Q4. How had the university changed some of the people interviewed in lesson 1.3a?

Check two options.

View
1.It had given them better people skills.
2.It helped them understand communication in different contexts.

Q5. What is argumentation?

Check one option.

View
A set of reasons to show that a conclusion is valid

Quiz 1: 2.1 Practice Quiz

Q1. Which of the habits of mind or dispositions discussed in lesson 2.1a is reflected in
The following quote?

“When I started thinking about my assignment question, the first thing I did was to start applying some of the techniques that I had learnt in my course. My lecturer had talked about a set of criteria that could be applied to problems in my field, so I used that to start generating solutions.”

Check one option.

View
Being systematic

Q2. Which of the habits of mind or dispositions discussed in lesson 2.1a is reflected in
the following quote?

“The final assignment in my organizational behavior course was a complex case study assignment about some issues in a large company. It’s unrealistic to expect in a tricky situation such as this that there is only one possible answer.”

Check one option.

View
Maturity

Q3. Which of the habits of mind or dispositions discussed in lesson 2.1a is reflected in
the following quote?

“Through my university course my lecturers really helped me reflect on my own thinking processes. One unit in particular made me do so using an online reflective blog. It was a bit of a pain at the time, but I recognize now how useful it is.”

Check one option.

View
Metacognition

Quiz 2: 2.2 Practice Quiz

Q1.Consider the following list of traits of the different spheres of argumentation.

1. Uses any example or means as evidence in arguments

2. No fixed rules for reasoning or evidence

3. Aimed at a specific audience

4. Tries to change opinions or values

5. Adheres to strict rules about data collection and analysis

6. Aimed at the general public

Which traits describe the technical sphere of argumentation?

View
3 and 5

Q2. Consider the following list of traits of the different spheres of argumentation.

1. Uses any example or means as evidence in arguments

2. No fixed rules for reasoning or evidence

3. Aimed at a specific audience

4. Tries to change opinions or values

5. Adheres to strict rules about data collection and analysis

6. Aimed at the general public

Which traits describe the personal sphere of argumentation?

View
1 and 2
4 and 6

Q3. Which argument sphere does the following argument belong to?

“We definitely need the new rail system in this area. Buses are usually late, and it’s a long way to drive to the city. It’s a bit more comfortable getting a train too I think.”

Check one option.

View
The personal sphere of argumentation

Quiz 3: 2.3 Practice Quiz

Q1. Which of the following are characteristics of argument fields?

Check three options.

View
1.The common object of study
2.Agreement on what knowledge is
3.Shared processes of thought

Q2. Apart from academic disciplines, what are some other things that can define an
argument field?

Check two options.

View
1.School of thought
2.Profession

Q3. Think back to the lesson on differences in argumentation in History and Biology. What is an example of a difference in argumentation in the arts and social sciences courses on the one hand, and science courses on the other?

Check one option.

View
In arts and social sciences courses students will generally need to engage in argumentation much earlier in their courses than science students.

Quiz 4: 2.4 Practice Quiz

Q1. What is a questioning stance, according to the lesson?

Check two options.

View
1.A general way of life
2.A way of approaching a text

Q2. Why is a questioning stance a central part of academic culture, according to Brick,
Herke and Wong (2016)?

Check one option.

View
Because argument and debate advance knowledge

Q3.Why do we need to take a questioning stance in our learning at university?

Check one option.

View
To more fully understand the topic you are
learning

Quiz 5: 2.5 Summative Quiz – Module 2

Q1. Consider the following situation.

A group of engineering students are doing a group assignment. The assignment asks them to calculate the ability of a tall building to withstand wind, earthquakes and other potential stresses. One student, who has worked through all the set questions and activities in class,
knows how to address the question and helps the others students complete the assignment with assurance.

Which of the following dispositions or habits of mind for critical thinking is the student displaying?

Check one option.

View
Self-confidence

Q2. Consider the following situation.

A student is asked to do a feminist analysis of a movie. The student already has strong opinions about both feminism and the film they must analyse. However, they make a mental note of their biases when conducting research. The student makes sure they read
sources representing a variety of different views, rather than just their own.

Which of the following dispositions or habits of mind for critical thinking is the student displaying?

Check one option.

View
Being systemic in your thinking

Q3. Which argument sphere does the following argument belong to?

“Proponents of the new rail network say that it will reduce traffic and car emissions. What is overlooked, however, is the enormous bill for the cost of the new rail network will present to current and future generations, a bill that the citizens of this state will be paying off for quite some time.”

Check one option.

View
The public sphere of argumentation.

Q4. Which argument sphere does the following argument belong to?

“In contrast with many neoclassical theorists, who see government spending as constrained, modern monetary theory (MMT) sees government spending as relatively less limited. This is because according to MMT the very notion of government debt is a misnomer due to the government’s control over the fiat money supply. Thus spending on infrastructure projects is
often seen as advantageous, particularly at times of low-interest rates.”

Check one option.

View
The academic sphere of argumentation

Q5. Consider the following methodology, which can be considered an argument field.

Conversation analysis is a well-defined method and school of thought that analyses language from a social perspective. It seeks to study naturally occurring talk, either in everyday conversations or institutional settings such as schools and organizations. Any conversation analysis must be strictly based on the actual conversation, and outside categories (such as the race or class of the speaker) cannot be imposed unless
they are referred to in the conversation being analyzed.

Conversation analysts seek to find out what actions are performed by speakers in conversation (e.g. telling stories, making arrangements), and how they organize their talk in
order to do that. They use a special mode of analysis to understand how actions are performed in talk called the next turn proof procedure. In this procedure, the action of the speaker is understood by examining how the following speaker understood them. When discussing the organization of talk, conversation analysts use terms such as turns, sequence organization and repair (how speakers fix errors in their talk).

When thinking about Conversation Analysis as an argument field, what is a specialized process of thought?

Check one option.

View
The next turn-proof procedure

Q6. Consider the following methodology, which can be considered an argument field.

Conversation analysis is a well-defined method and school of thought that analyses language from a social perspective. It seeks to study naturally occurring talk, either in everyday conversations or institutional settings such as schools and organizations. Any conversation analysis must be strictly based on the actual conversation, and outside
categories (such as the race or class of the speaker) cannot be imposed unless
they are referred to in the conversation being analyzed.

Conversation analysts seek to find out what actions are performed by speakers in conversation (e.g. telling stories, making arrangements), and how they organize their talks in
order to do that. They use a special mode of analysis to understand how actions are performed in a talk called the next turn proof procedure. In this procedure, the action of the speaker is understood by examining how the following speaker understood them. When
discussing the organization of the talk, conversation analysts use terms such as
turns, sequence organization, and repair (how speakers fix errors in their
talk).

When thinking about Conversation Analysis as an argument field, what is an object of study?

Check one option.

View
Naturally occurring talk-in-interaction

Q7. Consider the following abstract for an academic journal article.

Mega-events, such as the Olympic Games and world fairs, are a major factor in tourism development, urban revitalization, and urban reimaging strategies. However, despite their economic, social, and political significance, it is only within the last decade that substantial
attention has been paid to their impact and legacies. This article provides a
discussion of the scope and definition of mega-events, an analysis of the
reasons why mega-events are held, and offers an examination of the housing and
Social impact of mega-events on host cities and regions with special reference
to the housing and social planning of the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games. The
article concludes that the focus on the economic dimension of events is often
at the expense of social, environmental, and political analyses.

(Hall, C. M., & Hodges, J. (1996). The party’s great, but what about the hangover?: The housing and social impacts of mega-events with special reference to the 2000 Sydney Olympics. Festival Management and Event Tourism, 4 (1-1), 13-20.)

A student has taken a questioning stance towards this article. Here are some of the questions he has asked of the text.

  1. “What are the qualifications of C.M. Hall and J. Hodges?”
  2. “How could the information included in
    this article be used to better organize mega-events in the future?”
  3. “What are the weaknesses of their position
    on the impacts of mega-events?”
  4. “Do I agree with their notion that the
    The economic dimension of these events is in contradiction to environmental and
    social analyses?”
  5. “What evidence are Hall and Hodges using?”
  6. “Does their argument make sense?”

Which of these questions are content
questions?

Check one option.

View
1, 5 and 6

Q8. Consider the following abstract for an
academic journal article.

Mega-events, such as the Olympic Games and
world fairs, are a major factor in tourism development, urban revitalization,
and urban reimaging strategies. However, despite their economic, social, and
political significance, it is only within the last decade that substantial
attention has been paid to their impact and legacies. This article provides a
discussion of the scope and definition of mega-events, an analysis of the
reasons why mega-events are held, and offers an examination of the housing and
social impact of mega-events on host cities and regions with special reference
to the housing and social planning of the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games. The
article concludes that the focus on the economic dimension of events is often
at the expense of social, environmental, and political analyses.

(Hall, C. M., & Hodges, J. (1996). The
party’s great, but what about the hangover?: The housing and social impacts of
mega-events with special reference to the 2000 Sydney Olympics. Festival
Management and Event Tourism, 4(1-1), 13-20.)

A student has taken a questioning stance
towards this article. Here are some of the questions he has asked of the text.

  1. “What are the qualifications of C.M.
    Hall and J. Hodges?”
  2. “How could the information included in
    this article be used to better organise mega-events in the future?”
  3. “What are the weaknesses of their
    position on the impacts of mega-events?”
  4. “Do I agree with their notion that the
    economic dimension of these events is in contradiction to environmental and
    social analyses?”
  5. “What evidence are Hall and Hodges
    using?”
  6. “Does their argument make sense?”

Which of these questions are context
questions?

Check one option.

View
2, 3 and 4

Week 3: Critical Thinking Skills for University Success Coursera Quiz Answers

Quiz 1: 3.1 Practice Quiz

Q1. Have a look at the following statement. Which sentence is the conclusion?

I have the right to leave work after lunch. According
to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, article 24, everyone has the
right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours. I
have been working an unreasonable amount of hours.

Check one option.

View
The first sentence

Q2. Have a look at the following argument. What is one problem with the argument?

According to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
article 24, everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable
limitation of working hours. I have been working an unreasonable amount of
hours. Therefore, I have the right to leave work after lunch.

Check one option.

View
The second premise is not strong, because the
definition of ‘reasonable’ is unclear and needs to be further illustrated

Q3. Have a look at the following argument. What is the problem with the conclusion?

I have the right to leave work after lunch. According
to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, article 24, everyone has the
right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours. I
have been working an unreasonable amount of hours.

View
The conclusion is not the most logical result
of the premises.

Quiz 2: 3.2 Practice Quiz

Q1. Have a look at the following passage. What is wrong with the argument?

Every morning, as it gets closer to midday, the
temperature rises. At the same time, I always start to feel hungry. Therefore,
an increase in temperature makes me hungry.

Check one option.

View
It assumes that there is a cause-effect
relationship between the two trends.

Q2. Which of the following statements can be considered hasty generalizations?

Check one option.

View
All homeless people are unemployed.

Q3. Have a look at the following passage. What is wrong with the counter-argument?

Argument: Research suggests that restorative and reparative
punishments, such as community-service sentences, result in a reduction of
repeat offenders. This is particularly the case for minor, non-violent
offenses. The justice system should reduce the amount of prison sentences and
increase the number of community-service sentences for minor, non-violent
offences.*

Counter-argument: According to crime statistics,
between 50% and 60% of all released prisoners will re-offend. If you take
criminals out of jail and let them free on the street you will be putting innocent
people’s lives in danger.*

*Arguments are fictional

Check one option.

View
It misrepresents the original argument.

Quiz 3: 3.3 Practice Quiz

Q1. What is one of the downsides to using deductive reasoning in a university context?

Check one option.

View
Deductive reasoning needs to use strong, fixed
language and this means it can be more easily attacked and disproven than other
forms of reasoning.

Q2. What are the two main types of reasoning that you find at university?

Check two options.

View
1.Reasoning that moves from specific observations
to general conclusions
2.Reasoning that moves from general statements to specific
conclusions.

Q3. Consider the following argument:

The Artape people have lived on the island of Staples for between 20,000 and 25,000 years. A number of archaeological sites have been radiocarbon dated to around 19,000 BC, although there is evidence of some tools being used by hunters as early as 23,000 BC. They are thought to have migrated across from Africa on land bridges that existed before the last ice age. Archaeological evidence, such as oral stories, rock pictures and some ancient fossils, suggests that there was trade between the main land and the smaller island across these land bridges, but this stopped when the seas rose around 12,000 years ago.*

*Fictional people & history

What kind of reasoning is evident here?

Check one option.

View
This is an example of reasoning from specific
observations to general conclusions.

Quiz 4: 3.4 Practice Quiz

Q1. What is the problem with the following ‘laundry list’ approach to the issue of
homelessness?

Mental health issues >

Poverty > homelessness

Unemployment >

Check two options.

View
1. The list only indicates a one way
relationship between the causes and effect.
2.The list doesn’t demonstrate the relationship
between each factor and how they are related.

Q2. How can re-framing the following statement as a cycle (or a ‘feedback loop’) help create
a better understanding of the issue?

Mental health issues, unemployment and poverty are all
factors that lead to homelessness.

Check two options.

View
1. t demonstrates that the factors are all
inter-related and therefore a solution that addresses only one factor would not
be sufficient to solve the issue.
2.Thinking in terms of a cycle shows that it is
not only a cause-effect relationship, and that homelessness itself can
contribute to the factors of mental health issues, unemployment and poverty as
well.

Q3. As well as the benefits mentioned in regards to the feedback loop above, why else
would it be useful to see the issue of homelessness through a systems thinking
perspective, looking at the issue as a web of interrelated components?

Check two options.

View
1. To be able to see what occurs between each of
the individual components
2.It helps understand the complexity of the
issue and to see the bigger picture.

Quiz 5: Summative Quiz – Module 3

Q1. Have a look at the following argument based on an advertisement. What are the implicit (unspoken) premises?

There are many young, beautiful people on the beach having fun. They are drinking Cool
Cola. You should buy Cool Cola.

Check two options.

View
1.That Cool Cola makes the young, beautiful people in the advertisement happy
2. That if you buy Cool Cola you will also be young, beautiful and happy

Q2. Have a look at the following argument. What is the problem with the conclusion?

Cool Cola makes people happy. There are many young, beautiful people on a beach
having fun. They are drinking Cool Cola.

Check one option.

View
The conclusion does not follow from the premises.

Q3. Consider the following argument:

The Artape people have lived on the island of Staples for between 20,000 and 31,000
years. A number of archaeological sites have been radiocarbon dated to around
20,000 BC. They are thought to have migrated across from Africa on land bridges
that existed before the last ice age. Movement between the main land and
Staples across these land bridges was quite common. Archaeological evidence,
such as oral stories, rock pictures and some ancient fossils, suggests that the
Staler people, the ancestors of the Artape, used the island for hunting from as
far back as 31,000 BC. However, there is no evidence of settlement or
continuous habitation of the island until around 25,000 BC, when evidence of temporary
camps starts. It is not until 20,000 BC that we start to see evidence of permanent
dwellings. All migration from the main
land to Stapes stopped when the seas rose around 12,000 years ago. *

*Fictional peoples & History

What is the conclusion of this argument?

Check one option.

View
The Artape people and their ancestors have lived on the island of Staples for between 20,000 and 31,000 years.

Q4. People lived on the island of Staples as far back as 19,000 BC. Man-made artifacts
have been found at a number of archaeological sites. These man-made artifacts
have been carbon-dated to 19,000 BC. For example, a partial leg bone of a juvenile
marsupial herbivore was discovered at one of the sites. This partial leg bone
has been sharpened into a bone point. There is clear evidence of sharp stone
tools being used to refine the bone, which were also found at the site. The
fossil has no carnivore tooth marks on it and was found in a shelter on a steep
escarpment unsuitable for climbing by this kind of marsupial herbivore. Only humans have the capability and dexterity
to make and use these kinds of tools. This leg bone tool, therefore, was made
by humans. This serves as evidence that humans lived on the island of Staples
as far back as 19,000 BC. *

*Fictional historical account

What kind of formal reasoning is being used in this example?

Check one option.

View
This is an example of reasoning from specific observations to general conclusions.

Q5. Have a look at the following passage. What is wrong with the argument?

During the 2000s smartphone sales and ownership increased dramatically. At the same
time, warfare in the Middle East escalated. It is clear that smartphone usage
was a main contributor to the intensity of international warfare in the
2000s.

Check one option.

View
It assumes that there is a cause-effect relationship between the two trends.

Q6. Have a look at the following passage. What is wrong with the counter-argument?

Argument: Sometimes when you are having trouble writing your assignment it is good to
take a short break.

Counter-argument: Procrastinating instead of doing your work means nothing will ever get done.

Check one option.

View
It misrepresents the original argument.

Q7. What problems are there with the following ‘laundry list’ approach to the following issue:

Too many private cars

=>

Inadequate public transport

=>

congestion

Insufficient road networks

=>

Check two options.

View
1. It doesn’t provide any solutions to the problem.
2.It suggests a one-way relationship between the causes and the effect.

Q8. How can re-framing the following statement as a cycle (or a ‘feedback loop’) help create a better understanding of the issue?

Too many private cars, inadequate public transport and insufficient road networks
are all factors that lead to congestion.

Check two options.

View
1. It shows that any solution would have to address all of the factors that contribute to the issue.
2.Representing the situation as a cycle shows how the factors are interdependent and can affect each other.

Week 4: Critical Thinking Skills for University Success Coursera Quiz Answers

Quiz 1: 4.1 Practice Quiz

Q1. Is the following sentence a claim or evidence?

Homelessness is still a major issue in Australia
because policy makers haven’t made a concerted effort to fund and commit to one
particular project for an appropriate length of time.

Check one option.

View
A claim

Q2. Analyze the following paragraph. What is the origin
of the evidence?

Homelessness is still a major issue in Australia
because policy makers haven’t made a concerted effort to fund and commit to one
particular project for an appropriate length of time. This is clear from
research that has analyzed the history of homelessness programs in recent
years. Parsell, Jones & Head draw on an extensive list of published
articles and government reports analyzing homelessness programs in the UK, USA
and Australia to conclude that “[a]ttracted by the successes in the UK and USA,
Australian policy makers attempted a piecemeal transfer making it unlikely that
the goal of permanently ending homelessness will be achieved” (Parsell, Jones
& Head, 2012)

Reference:

Parsell,
C., Jones, A. and Head, B. (2013). Policies
and programs to end homelessness in Australia: Learning from international
practice. International Journal of Social
Welfare, 13, 10–23.

Check one option

View
The authors’ interpretation of other people’s
experience

Q3. Analyse the following paragraph. What is the mode
of the evidence?

Homelessness is still a major issue in Australia
because policy makers haven’t made a concerted effort to fund and commit to one
particular project for an appropriate length of time. This is clear from
research that has analyzed the history of homelessness programs in recent
years. Parsell, Jones & Head draw on an extensive list of published
articles and government reports analyzing homelessness programs in the UK, USA
and Australia to arrive at the conclusion that “attracted by the successes in
the UK and USA, Australian policy makers attempted a piecemeal transfer making
it unlikely that the goal of permanently ending homelessness will be achieved”
(Parsell, Jones & Head, 2012).

Reference:

Parsell,
C., Jones, A. and Head, B. (2013). Policies and programs to end homelessness
in Australia: Learning from international practice. International Journal of Social Welfare, 13, 10–23.

Check one option.

View
Print media

Q4. Analyze the following paragraph. What is the purpose
of the evidence?

Homelessness is still a major issue in Australia
because policy makers haven’t made a concerted effort to fund and commit to one
particular project for an appropriate length of time. This is clear from
research that has analyzed the history of homelessness programs in recent
years. Parsell, Jones & Head draw on an extensive list of published
articles and government reports analyzing homelessness programs in the UK, USA
and Australia to arrive at the conclusion that “attracted by the successes in
the UK and USA, Australian policy makers attempted a piecemeal transfer making
it unlikely that the goal of permanently ending homelessness will be achieved”
(Parsell, Jones & Head, 2012).

Reference:

Parsell,
C., Jones, A. and Head, B. (2013). Policies and programs to end homelessness
in Australia: Learning from international practice. International Journal of Social Welfare, 13, 10–23.

Check one option.

View
Academic

Q5. Analyze the following paragraph. What is the source
of the evidence?

Homelessness is still a major issue in Australia
because policy makers haven’t made a concerted effort to fund and commit to one
particular project for an appropriate length of time. This is clear from
research that has analyzed the history of homelessness programs in recent
years. Parsell, Jones & Head draw on an extensive list of published
articles and government reports analyzing homelessness programs in the UK, USA
and Australia to arrive at the conclusion that “attracted by the successes in
the UK and USA, Australian policy makers attempted a piecemeal transfer making
it unlikely that the goal of permanently ending homelessness will be achieved”
(Parsell, Jones & Head, 2012).

Reference:

Parsell, C., Jones, A. and Head, B. (2013). Policies and programmes to end
homelessness in Australia: Learning from international practice. International Journal of Social Welfare, 13,
10–23

View
Secondary

Quiz 2: 4.2 Practice Quiz

Q1. What is the difference between a bias and an assumption?

Check
one option.

View
A bias is a prejudice for or against someone
or something and an assumption is a type of claim with no evidence.

Q2. Consider the following statement.

We can see three types of homeless living on the streets of Albuquerque. There are
those poor souls that are homeless due to bad luck; there are drunkards and
drug addicts; and there are inveterate criminals.

What is the main kind of bias present?

Check one option.

View
False classification scheme

Q3. What kind of bias is present in the following statement?

The key to solving homelessness is social housing.

Check one option.

View
Use of certain or definitive language

Quiz 3: 4.3 Practice Quiz

Q1. What problem is there with the following evidence?

Homelessness is an increasingly worrying problem in the
USA. According to Langdon and Kass (1985), “[homelessness] is a national crisis
of ever-increasing proportions. Hundreds of thousands of persons across the
country are so desperately poor that they lack even minimal shelter” (p.305).
They state that there are more homeless people now than any time since the
Great Depression.

Reference:

Langdon,
J. K. & Kass, M.A. (1985). Homelessness in America: Looking for the Right
to Shelter. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, 19(3), 305-392.

Choose one option.

View
Currency

Q2. What questions can you ask to determine if the evidence is relevant to the
conclusion?

Check two options.

View
Does the evidence support the conclusion?

If I took the evidence away, would it make a
difference to the conclusion?

Q3. What problem is there with the following argument?

There are more homeless people now than at any time
since the Great Depression. The Great Depression ended with the onset of World
War II. Therefore, a similar momentous event is needed to end the current
plight of homelessness.

Check two options.

View
1. The link between the two premises is only a
correlation, not a causal relationship.
2.The conclusion is not the most logical
outcome from the premises.

Quiz 4: 4.4 Practice Quiz

Q1. Consider the following statement.

“In the case of some areas of the internet that are heavily regulated, online trade
has suffered from excess government regulation and control. It’s not hard to
imagine the same thing happening if that kind of control was extended to all
areas of the online economy.”

What type of argument is this?

Check one option.

View
Generalization

Q2. Consider the following statement.

“There are many vulnerable children on the internet outside government protection, but
Vulnerable children need the government to protect them, so more government
surveillance is needed.”

What type of argument is this?

Check one option.

  • Argument from analogy
  • Generalization
  • Causal argument
  • Quasilogical argument

Q3. Consider the following statement.

“A failure to act on threats made on social media sites by both the government and authorities has led to female users abandoning certain sites.”

What type of argument is this?

Check one option.

View
Causal argument

Quiz 5: Summative Quiz – Module 4

Q1. Consider the following argument.

Young people in lowly-paid jobs need to be given rental assistance from the
government. They also need to get paid more by their employers. Perhaps
employers could receive tax breaks from the government, which they could then
pass on to young employees as higher wages.

Which of the following statements, about the claims and evidence in this argument,
are true?

Check two options.

  • ‘Employers getting tax breaks from the government’ is a form of evidence in this argument.
  • Rental assistance is necessary for lowly-paid poor people’ is a claim of this argument.
  • The origin of the evidence in this argument is not clearly stated.
  • No evidence is presented in this argument.

Q2. Consider the following argument.

Homelessness is often considered the preserve of the middle-aged, but it also falls heavily
on young people. In the Springton area, for example, quite a few homeless people can be observed, particularly in the area bound by Holroyd and 4th St.

What is the origin of the evidence?

Check one option.

  • Non-academic
  • Primary
  • Verbal communication
  • Personal experience

Q3. Consider the following statement.

The laws were criticized as being ‘out of touch’ and ‘antiquated’.

How is bias displayed in this statement?

Check one option.

  • False classification schemes
  • Use of passive voice to hide responsibility
  • Ad hominem
  • Appealing to membership of a common group

Q4. Consider the following statement.

The treatment of homeless people is a sad indictment on this government and its policies.

How is bias displayed in this statement?

Check one option.

  • Use of emotive language
  • Ad hominem
  • Appealing to membership of a common group
  • Use of logical connectors and appealing to
    membership of a common group

Q5. Consider the following argument.

All pugs are dogs. Dogs are good pets. All dogs are mammals. Therefore, all pugs are mammals.

What questions can you ask to determine if the evidence is relevant to the conclusion in the following statement?

Check two options.

  • Is the evidence old and out-of-date?
  • If I took the evidence away, would it make a difference to the conclusion?
  • Does the evidence seem convincing?
  • Does the evidence support the conclusion?

Q6. What problem is there with the following argument?

I have all my best ideas in the shower. I need to regularly have good ideas when I am at work. Therefore, I need to have numerous showers during the day in order to perform well at work.

Check one option.

  • Nothing. It is a good argument.
  • The premises are false.
  • The premises are not connected.
  • The conclusion is not the most logical outcome from the premises.

Q7. Consider the following argument.

Social housing should be considered an opportunity to move past current market-based
methods of organizing shelter for people, rather than as a burden for governments.

What type of argument is this?

Check one option.

  • Dissociation argument
  • Co-existential argument
  • Generalization
  • Causal argument

Q8. Consider the following argument.

The current crisis with homelessness in Dartshire, our sister city in so many ways, is an important lesson to us here. The same problem could well occur here too if city hall doesn’t provide more options for those without accommodation in
the near future.

What type of argument is this?

Check one option.

  • Quasilogical argument
  • Generalization
  • Co-existential argument
  • Argument from analogy

Week 6: Critical Thinking Skills for University Success Coursera Quiz Answers

Quiz 1: 5.1 Practice Quiz

Q1. Read the following argument. Identify which sentences are part of the argument chain.

(1) A significant percentage of people experiencing
homelessness are aged between 0-24 years of age. (2) One contributing factor
for youth homelessness is a lack of exit planning after leaving statutory care,
juvenile justice or medical facilities. (3) If there was increased funding for
exit planning then youth at risk would have more opportunities for support. (4)
If there were more opportunities for support then there would be a higher
chance of intervention when at-risk youth face homelessness. (5) This would
lead to a decrease in youth homelessness. (6) Therefore, funding for better
exit planning would lead to a decrease in youth homelessness.

View
Sentences 3, 4, 5 and 6

Check one option.

Q2.Read the following argument. Is sentence (5) an appropriate sentence for a chain
argument?

(1) A significant percentage of people experiencing homelessness are aged between 0-24 years of age. (2) One contributing factor
for youth homelessness is a lack of exit planning after leaving statutory care,
juvenile justice or medical facilities. (3) If there was increased funding for
exit planning then youth at risk would have more opportunities for support. (4)
If there were more opportunities for support then there would be a higher
chance of intervention when at-risk youth face homelessness. (5) This would
lead to a decrease in youth homelessness. (6) Therefore, funding for better
exit planning would lead to a decrease in youth homelessness.

Check one option.

View
Yes, because it links the previous premise with a new premise.

Q3. Read the following statement. What is the purpose of the argument?

If there was increased funding for exit planning for
youth leaving statutory care, juvenile justice or medical facilities then there
would be a decrease in youth homelessness. There is not increased funding, so there
will not be a decrease in youth homelessness.

Choose one option.

View
To prove a point

Q4. Read the following statement. What is the problem with the conclusion?

If there was increased funding for exit planning for youth leaving statutory care, juvenile justice or medical facilities then there would be a decrease in youth homelessness. There is not increased funding, so there will not be a decrease in youth homelessness.

Check two options.

View
1. It is not the most logical outcome of the premise.

2.It does not use necessary hedging, or cautious, language.

Q5. Read the following statement. What is wrong with the argument?

If there is no funding for exit planning for young
people leaving juvenile justice then those at-risk youth will not have adequate
support or stability. If they don’t have adequate support or stability they
will not be able to focus on their studies. If those youth are unable to focus
on their studies they will drop out of school. If they drop out of school they
will not be able to gain employment or be engaged meaningfully. This would lead
them to a life of petty crime and worse.

Check two options.

View
1. The premises do not present the most logical progression.
2. There are too many generalizations and assumptions for the argument to be convincing.

Quiz 2: 5.2 Practice Quiz

Q1. Consider the following argument.

Homeless people should be allowed to occupy unused
buildings that are owned by others (commonly referred to as “squatting”), as there
are an estimated 700 000 empty properties in England that could be used as
shelter. Any right that owners may claim to property is superseded by the
rights of homeless people to shelter, as the right to shelter is an inalienable
human right. This right to shelter applies in almost all cases of unoccupied
properties, but of course would not apply if the property was only unoccupied
in the short term.

(Adapted from Vasudevan, A. (2011, November 3). The sinister logic behind criminalising
squatting. The Guardian. Retrieved
from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/nov/03/criminalising-squatting-law-trespass-homeless)

“Any right that owners may claim to property is superseded by the rights of homeless
people to shelter” is which part of the Toulmin model of argumentation?

Check one option.

View
Warrant

Q2. Consider the following argument.

Homeless people should be allowed to occupy unused buildings that are owned by others (commonly referred to as “squatting”), as there are an estimated 700 000 empty properties in England that could be used as shelter. Any right that owners may claim to property is superseded by the rights of homeless people to shelter, as the right to shelter is an inalienable human right. This right to shelter applies in almost all cases of unoccupied
properties, but of course would not apply if the property was only unoccupied
in the short term.

(Adapted from Vasudevan, A. (2011, November 3). The sinister logic behind criminalising
squatting. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/nov/03/criminalising-squatting-law-trespass-homeless)

“This right to shelter applies in almost all cases of unoccupied properties” is which
part of the Toulmin model of argumentation?

Check one option.

View
Qualifier

Q3. Consider the following argument.

Homeless people should be allowed to occupy unused buildings that are owned by others (commonly referred to as “squatting”), as there are an estimated 700 000 empty properties in England that could be used as shelter. Any right that owners may claim to property is superseded by the
rights of homeless people to shelter, as the right to shelter is an inalienable
human right. This right to shelter applies in almost all cases of unoccupied
properties, but of course would not apply if the property was only unoccupied
in the short term.

(Adapted from Vasudevan, A. (2011, November 3). The sinister logic behind criminalising
squatting. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/nov/03/criminalising-squatting-law-trespass-homeless)

“The right to shelter is an inalienable human right” is which part of the Toulmin
model of argumentation?

Check one option.

View
Backing

Quiz 3: 5.3 Practice Quiz

Q1. Which of the following are characteristics JUST of critique?

Check three options.

View
1. A structural rather than just an individual
worldview
2.Focussing on power and inequality
3.Socially and politically active

Q2. A common focus of critique is on unjust ideologies. Which of the following views
on unjust ideologies are features of critique, according to the lecture?

Check two options.

View
1. The influence of unjust ideologies can be
seen in thinking and theory itself.
2.Unjust ideologies help maintain unequal power
structures.

Q3. In which of the following faculties would you be more likely to find critique as a
way of understanding and analyzing the world?

Check two options.

View
1.Education
2.Literary Studies

Quiz 4: 5.4 Practice Quiz

Q1. Which of the following should you include in a reflection?

Check four options.

View
1. Review and analysis of a topic, practice, theory
or experience
2.Questions about a topic, practice, theory or
experience
3.Research and evidence
4.Possible answers or solutions

Q2. Consider the following reflection from a university course in Education. Note that this
particular reflection had a word limit of 200-550 words, and students were
instructed to reflect on the idea of being a critically reflective teacher. Stephen Brookfield (1995), in his analysis of why critical reflection is important to teaching, suggests that “an uncritical stance towards our practice sets us up for a lifetime of frustration” (para. 2). He suggests this is because teachers
can have a different view of their classrooms to what is actually going on:
they are unaware. This contradiction fascinates me. While on my prac
placements, I was particularly conscious of this – lessons that I thought to be
fantastic or boring, when looked at through a critical eye, turned out to be
the opposite, or at least more in the middle. It was frustrating, to say the
least. What we had learnt in our education theory courses didn’t quite match up
to real-life experience. Having my supervisor give me notes at the end really
helped me in evaluating my teaching and planning the next lesson. This, coupled
with my own observations of my students allowed me to more closely align what
Brookfield would call the “meaning and significance” (para 2) I intended for
the lesson to what the students took from it. While being observed sometimes
felt a bit “big brother” and sometimes just embarrassing, I have no doubt that
it made me a better teacher. These kinds of ‘learning processes’ throughout a
teaching career are important because they force us to revaluate our practice;
to, in effect, become aware.

Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, LA:
Jossey-Bass.

Now, consider just this section: “While on my prac placements, I was
particularly conscious of this – lessons that I thought to be fantastic or
boring when looked at through a critical eye, turned out to be the opposite,
or at least more in the middle. It was frustrating, to say the least.”

Which stage of Baker’s (1996) critical reflection is this an example of?

View
Identification & description

Q3. Consider the same reflection from a university course in Education. Note that this
particular reflection had a word limit of 200-550 words, and students were
instructed to reflect on the idea of being a critically reflective
teacher.

Stephen Brookfield (1995), in his analysis of why critical reflection is important to teaching, suggests that “an uncritical stance towards our practice sets us up for a lifetime of frustration” (para 2). He suggests this is because teachers can have a different view of their classrooms to what is actually going on: they are unaware. This contradiction fascinates me. While on my prac placements, I was particularly conscious of this – lessons that I thought to be fantastic or boring, when looked at through a critical eye, turned out to be
the opposite, or at least more in the middle. It was frustrating, to say the
least. What we had learnt in our education theory courses didn’t quite match up
to real-life experience. Having my supervisor give me notes at the end really
helped me in evaluating my teaching and planning the next lesson. This, coupled
with my own observations of my students allowed me to more closely align what
Brookfield would call the “meaning and significance” (para 2) I intended for
the lesson to what the students took from it. While being observed sometimes
felt a bit “big brother” and sometimes just embarrassing, I have no doubt that
it made me a better teacher. These kinds of ‘learning processes’ throughout a
teaching career are important because they force us to revaluate our practice;
to, in effect, become aware.

Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, LA:
Jossey-Bass.

Now, consider just this section: “While being observed sometimes felt
a bit “big brother” and sometimes just embarrassing, I have no doubt that it
made me a better teacher. These kinds of ‘learning processes’ throughout a
teaching career are important because they force us to revaluate our practice;
to, in effect, become aware.”

Which stage of Baker’s (1996) critical reflection is this an example of?

View
Implications

Quiz 5: Summative Quiz – Module 5

Q1. Read the following argument. Which sentences are part of the argument chain?

(1) Better data on homelessness would ultimately contribute to a decrease in homelessness. (2) There is currently a need for a client information system that would help provide
assessment, referrals and information sharing across the multiple homelessness
services. (3) Improved communication across the different services would ensure
that the clients’ needs are being addressed. (4) Moreover, improved data would
help identify which services are most in demand. (5) If the in-demand services
were identified then it would mean greater resources could be allocated to
those areas. (6) This would allow for greater outreach to homeless people with
services that they need. (7) If this was successful then it would mean more
people experiencing homelessness received the support that they needed.

Check one option.

View
1, 4, 5, 6 and 7

Q2. Read the following argument. Which sentence is the conclusion?

(1) Better data on homelessness would ultimately contribute to a decrease in homelessness. (2) There is currently a need for a client information system that would help provide assessment, referrals, and information sharing across the multiple homelessness services.(3) Improved communication across the different services would ensure
that the clients’ needs are being addressed. (4) Moreover, improved data would
help identify which services are most in demand. (5) If the in-demand services
were identified then it would mean greater resources could be allocated to
those areas. (6) This would allow for greater outreach to homeless people with
services that they need. (7) If this outreach was successful then it would mean
more people experiencing homelessness received the support that they needed.

Check one option.

View
(7)

Q3. For a piece of reflective writing, where should you begin?

Check one option.

View
With an experience or event that raised questions or demonstrated a gap in your knowledge

Q4. Consider the following reflection from a university course in Education. Note that this
particular reflection had a word limit of 200-550 words, and students were
instructed to reflect on the idea of being a critically reflective
teacher.

Stephen Brookfield (1995), in his analysis of why critical reflection is important to teaching, suggests that “an uncritical stance towards our practice sets us up for a lifetime of
frustration” (para 2). He suggests this is because teachers can have a different view of their classrooms to what is actually going on: they are unaware. This contradiction fascinates me. While on my prac placements, I was particularly conscious of this – lessons that I
thought to be fantastic or boring, when looked at through a critical eye,
turned out to be the opposite, or at least more in the middle. It was
frustrating, to say the least. What we had learnt in our education theory
courses didn’t quite match up to real-life experience. Having my supervisor
give me notes at the end really helped me in evaluating my teaching and
planning the next lesson. This, coupled with my own observations of my students
allowed me to more closely align what Brookfield would call the “meaning and
significance” (para 2) I intended for the lesson to what the students took from
it. While being observed sometimes felt a bit “big brother” and sometimes just
embarrassing, I have no doubt that it made me a better teacher. These kinds of
‘learning processes’ throughout a teaching career are important because they
force us to revaluate our practice; to, in effect, become aware.

Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, LA: Jossey-Bass.

Which of the following sections of the text does the student talk about the significance of the event or experience?

Check two options.

View
While being observed sometimes felt a bit “big brother” and sometimes just embarrassing, I have no doubt that it made me a better teacher. These kinds of ‘learning processes’ throughout a teaching career are important because they force us to re-evaluate our practice; to, in effect, become aware.

Q5. Consider the following argument.

There are numerous examples of people struggling to remove squatters due to the
inadequacy of the law. For example, Imran Lakhani, despite finding squatters on
his property while working overseas, struggled for 6 months to remove the
squatters in his house. Dale Morrison faced similar issues too when she and her
family returned from holiday to find squatters in their house. These cases
clearly demonstrate that laws against squatting on private property should be
tightened. Of course, these changes would only apply to private property to
retain people’s right to protest on public land.

Which of the following statements from this text is the Claim?

Check one option.

View
There are numerous examples of people struggling to remove squatters due to the inadequacy of the law.”

Q6. Consider the following argument.

There are numerous examples of people struggling to remove squatters due to the
inadequacy of the law. For example, Imran Lakhani, despite finding squatters on
his property while working overseas, struggled for 6 months to remove the
squatters in his house. Dale Morrison faced similar issues too when she and her
family returned from holiday to find squatters in their house. These cases
clearly demonstrate that laws against squatting on private property should be
tightened. Of course, these changes would only apply to private property to
retain people’s right to protest on public land.

Which of the following statements from this text is the Warrant?

Check one option.

View
These cases clearly demonstrate that laws against squatting on private property should be tightened.”

Q7. Consider the following fictional newspaper article.

Homeless man Mike Davis pulled himself back on his feet with some hard work in his new
micro business, cleaning local restaurants and bars. While his micro business
might have given him a newfound sense of dignity, along with a few dollars,
Mike confessed to his case manager Susan Lee at New Choices Welfare that he
still had an unfulfilled dream – to find his long-lost sister in the city of
Bramingham. That’s when Susan, in conjunction with Flyaway Travel, worked to
make Mike’s dream a reality …

A cultural studies theorist critiques the article in the following way.

Another example of the responsibilization of homelessness can be seen in an article in
the Southern Messenger (Diaz, 2011). A narrative of individual self-help,
supported by the newspaper’s advertisers, is told, ignoring the broader systemic nature of homelessness.

Which feature of critique, outlined in lesson 5.3a, can be found in the
theorist’s writing?

View
A structural worldview is needed, where individual issues are socio-political phenomena.

Q8. Consider the following fictional newspaper article.

Homeless man Mike Davis pulled himself back on his feet with some hard work in his new
micro business, cleaning local restaurants and bars. While his micro business
might have given him a newfound sense of dignity, along with a few dollars,
Mike confessed to his case manager Susan Lee at New Choices Welfare that he
still had an unfulfilled dream – to find his long-lost sister in the city of
Bramingham. That’s when Susan, in conjunction with Flyaway Travel, worked to
make Mike’s dream a reality …

A cultural studies theorist continues critiquing the article in the following way.

Narratives of individual responsibility, such as the Southern Messenger article, serve to
redirect blame toward the homeless for their fate. This ideology then reinforces how the broader housing system, prioritizes the exchange-value of houses on the market rather than their use-value as accommodation, creating a homeless underclass.

Which feature of critique, outlined in lesson 5.3a, can be found in the theorist’s writing?

View
Unjust ideologies maintain unequal power structures.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, the Critical Thinking Skills for University Success Coursera Quiz Answers provide a transformative learning experience that equips you with the essential tools to excel in both academic and real-life challenges. By delving into the intricacies of critical thinking, analysis, and problem-solving, these meticulously prepared quiz solutions empower you to navigate complex information, make well-informed decisions, and approach tasks with a strategic mindset.

More Related Quiz Answers >>

Teach English Now! Second Language Listening, Speaking, and Pronunciation Quiz Answers

Teach English Now! Second Language Reading, Writing, and Grammar Quiz Answers

Team Networking Funda
Team Networking Funda

We are Team Networking Funda, a group of passionate authors and networking enthusiasts committed to sharing our expertise and experiences in networking and team building. With backgrounds in Data Science, Information Technology, Health, and Business Marketing, we bring diverse perspectives and insights to help you navigate the challenges and opportunities of professional networking and teamwork.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *